Haden COLUMBIA, 8/9/10 (Beat Byte) -- Concerned about the content and context of an email warning sent from a Columbia Police detective, CPD public information officer Jessie Haden (left) asked this writer why she hadn't been contacted to confirm the detective's identity before an August 3 Heart Beat story, WARNING: "Police detective" email sounds bike rally alarm.
"You never asked me about the source of the e-mail," Haden wrote me."The individual who forwarded the email -- a credible person -- stood by the account that it was from a Columbia police department detective," I explained. "But this individual wouldn't reveal the name of the source, a personal friend. I felt it best to leave it there, duly noting that 'Attempts to confirm the identity of the emailing Paul Revere were unsuccessful' and using qualifiers like 'purportedly' and 'alleged.' I did believe that it originated from a CPD detective.""You're right about [the email's] origin," Haden said. "I'm just saying, if your source won't confirm, please feel free to check with me on these things; I may not know, but I may," she explained. "I actually do in this case and could have filled you in. Clarifying all that kind of makes it a non-story."Haden makes a number of valid points. But absent primary source confirmation, "only very rarely would I go to a secondary source not directly involved" (in this case, Officer Haden), I explained.Haden did not release the identity of the CPD detective who sent the email nor did I request it. Given the new information, the story does seem larger, however.

